![]() ![]() The second section examines the proposals to see populism as part of emancipatory politics, showing that this perspective of conceiving populism is compatible with cosmopolitanism. Thus, the first section of the paper examines the main features of populism, seen mostly from the perspective of populism as a pathology. This paper examines the confluences between populism and cosmopolitanism, and assesses the limits of this convergence. In this new theoretical context, the incompatibility between populism and cosmopolitanism is weakening, points of convergence between two concepts start becoming visible. Authors discover the promise and relevance of populism, while within the political theory of cosmopolitanism there are calls towards 'roots', as in the concept of rooted or vernacular cosmopolitanisms. cosmopolitanism and populism is changing. ![]() However, the paradigm of conceiving both. ![]() Cosmopolitanism and populism are opposing concepts: populism usually sees persons as embedded in national or ethnic communities, while the core idea shared by all cosmopolitan views is that all human beings belong to a single community and the ultimate units of moral concern are individual human beings, not particular forms of human associations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |